Indicators on case law on bail on new facts You Should Know
Indicators on case law on bail on new facts You Should Know
Blog Article
33 . Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Additionally, the main objectives on the police is to apprehend offenders, investigate crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and higher than all, make certain legislation and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The regulation enjoins the police to generally be scrupulously fair to your offender and the Magistracy is to be sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court and also from other Courts, Nonetheless they have failed to have any corrective effect on it.
For legal professionals, there are specific rules regarding case citation, which range depending to the court and jurisdiction hearing the case. Proper case law citation inside of a state court is probably not correct, or maybe accepted, within the U.
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this is actually a free and democratic country, and once a person becomes a major she or he can marry whosoever he/she likes; When the parents from the boy or Lady usually do not approve of this sort of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the most they will do if they could cut off social relations with the son or even the daughter, However they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes these inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or girl that's major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or gentleman that's a major, the couple is neither harassed by any individual nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anybody who offers this kind of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence possibly himself or at his instigation, is taken to undertaking by instituting criminal proceedings through the police against such persons and further stern action is taken against this sort of person(s) as provided by legislation.
The necessary analysis (called ratio decidendi), then constitutes a precedent binding on other courts; further analyses not strictly necessary towards the determination in the current case are called obiter dicta, which constitute persuasive authority but usually are not technically binding. By contrast, decisions in civil legislation jurisdictions are generally shorter, referring only to statutes.[4]
thirteen . Const. P. 209/2025 (S.B.) Saifullah Jamali (Disable) V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi After arguing the matter at some length, both parties have agreed into the disposal of the moment petition about the premise that the DIGP Malir will listen to the petitioner along with private respondents and will choose care of every one website of the components of the case and be certain that no harassment shall be caused to both the parties.
For your foregoing reasons the instant suit is dismissed with no order as to cost. Office to prepare decree in the above mentioned terms. Read more
PLR can be a revolutionizing platform democratizing and making legal research easy and accessible in Pakistan :
In federal or multi-jurisdictional regulation systems there may well exist conflicts between the different reduced appellate courts. Sometimes these differences might not be resolved, and it could be necessary to distinguish how the law is applied in a single district, province, division or appellate department.
ten. Without touching the merits with the case of your issue of once-a-year increases inside the pensionary emoluments on the petitioner, in terms of policy decision from the provincial government, these once-a-year increase, if permissible while in the case of employees of KMC, requires further assessment to generally be made with the court of plenary jurisdiction. KMC's reluctance due to funding issues and lack of adoption of provincial increases, creates a factual dispute that cannot be resolved in writ jurisdiction, requiring the petitioner to pursue other legal avenues. Read more
Article 27 of the Constitution does not only safeguard against discrimination for the time of appointment of service but after the appointment in addition. The disparity while in the fork out scale allowances of Stenographers inside the District Judiciary is while in the apparent negation in the law laid down from the Supreme Court in its many pronouncements. Read more
182 . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi As far as the stance in the respondents that pensionary benefits might be withheld on account of the allegations leveled against the petitioner, inside our view, section twenty in the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does offer for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension could possibly be withheld or reduced. These include if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension could be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a serious crime, their pension can be withheld or reduced. In certain cases, a civil servant's pension might be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions established via the government.
These lists are sorted chronologically by Chief Justice and involve all notable cases decided because of the court. Articles exist for almost all cases.
Normally, only an appeal accepted by the court of final vacation resort will resolve these kinds of differences and, For a lot of reasons, such appeals will often be not granted.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming into the main case, It is usually a well-set up proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence from the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty with the charge, however, that is matter to the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings on the evidence.